Objective
To identify the proportion of individuals with an accurate perception of their risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) prior to, immediately after and eight weeks after receiving a personalised risk estimate. Additionally, we aimed to explore what factors are associated with underestimation and overestimation immediately post-intervention.

Methods
Cohort study based on the data collected in the Diabetes Risk Communication Trial. We included 379 participants (mean age 48.9 (SD 7.4) years; 55.1% women) who received a genotypic or phenotypic risk estimate for T2D.

Results
While only 1.3% of participants perceived their risk accurately at baseline, this increased to 24.7% immediately after receiving a risk estimate and then dropped to 7.3% at eight weeks. Those who overestimated their risk at baseline continued to overestimate it, whereas those who underestimated their risk at baseline improved their risk accuracy. We did not identify any other characteristics associated with underestimation or overestimation immediately after receiving a risk estimate.

Conclusion
Understanding a received risk estimate is challenging for most participants with many continuing to have inaccurate risk perception after receiving the estimate.

Practice implications
Individuals who overestimate or underestimate their T2D risk before receiving risk information might require different approaches for altering their risk perception.

Direct Link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.07.023

Journal: Patient education and counseling. 2018 Jan 1;101(1):43-51.

Keywords: diabetes, energy expenditure, optimism, risk assessment,

Applications: Energy Expenditure,

CamNtech Reference: AH18043

Back to Search Results

UK & International customers

CamNtech Ltd.
Manor Farm
Fenstanton
Cambridgeshire
PE28 9JD, UK

US customers

CamNtech Inc.
630 Boerne Stage Airfield,
Boerne,
Texas 78006,
USA

Copyright

© 2020 CamNtech Ltd and CamNtech Inc

Company information

Registered in England No. 2221302
VAT No: GB486 3019 34


Privacy Policy